A study in the rat of the renal actions of nitrendipine and diltiazem on the adrenergic regulation of calcium and sodium reabsorption
Open Access
- 31 August 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 89 (1) , 99-107
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb11125.x
Abstract
1 In pentobarbitone-anaesthetized rats, intravenous administration of diltiazem at 5 μg kg−1 min−1 did not change blood pressure or renal blood flow but increased glomerular filtration rate by approximately 16%, urine flow by 85%, calcium excretion by 151% and absolute and fractional sodium excretions by 100% and 69%, respectively. A similar pattern of responses was obtained in renally denervated animals, except that calcium excretion did not change statistically. Diltiazem given at 20 μg kg−1 min−1 into renally innervated and denervated groups of animals depressed blood pressure between 15–17 mmHg but had no effect on renal haemodynamic or tubular function. 2 Nitrendipine administered at 0.5 μg kg−1 min−1 to renally innervated and denervated animals significantly depressed blood pressure in intact animals by 6 mmHg and in both groups did not change renal haemodynamics but caused similar increases in urine flow of between 79–98%, calcium excretion of between 87 and 125%, absolute sodium excretion of between 108 and 140% and fractional sodium excretion of between 83 and 170%. Infusion of nitrendipine at 1.0 μg kg−1 min−1 into intact or renally denervated animals decreased blood pressure by 18–20 mmHg and increased urine flow by 84–111%, calcium excretion by 85%, absolute sodium excretion by 81–137% and fractional sodium excretion by 52–102%. 3 Stimulation of the renal nerves at low frequencies (0.8 to 1.5 Hz) caused minimal changes in renal haemodynamics but decreased urine flow by 27%, calcium excretion by 35%, absolute and fractional sodium excretions 32% and 36%, respectively. In different groups of animals given either diltiazem at 20 μg kg−1 min−1 or nitrendipine at 0.5 μg kg−1 min−1 or l.0 μg kg−1 min−1, a similar degree of renal nerve stimulation caused an identical pattern of excretory responses of similar magnitude to those obtained in the absence of drug. 4 The calciuretic, diuretic and natriuretic activities of diltiazem and nitrendipine were not dependent on renal nerves and probably represented a direct action on the tubular reabsorptive processes of these ions. The renal nerve-induced increases in tubular calcium and sodium reabsorption indicate that these α-adrenoceptor-mediated responses are not dependent on the inward movement of calciumThis publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distribution and function of classes of ATPases along the nephronKidney International, 1986
- THE INFLUENCE OF DILTIAZEM AND NIFEDIPINE ON THE HAEMODYNAMIC AND TUBULAR RESPONSES OF THE RAT KIDNEY TO RENAL NERVE STIMULATIONJournal of Autonomic Pharmacology, 1985
- Natriuretic Effect of Calcium AntagonistsJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1985
- Calcium Dependency of Vasoconstriction Mediated by α1- and α2-AdrenoceptorsJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1985
- Interference of the Calcium Antagonist Nisoldipine with the Abnormal Response of Vessels from Hypertensive Rats to α-Adrenergic StimulationJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1985
- NitrendipineCardiovascular Drug Reviews, 1984
- Effects of intrarenal infusion of calcium entry blockers in anesthetized dogs.Hypertension, 1983
- Effects of the Calcium Antagonist Nicardipine on Renal Function and Renin Release in DogsJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1983
- Studies on a New 1, 5-Benzothiazepine Derivative (CRD-401)The Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, 1974
- A METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF INULIN IN PLASMA AND URINEActa Medica Scandinavica, 1952