Image quality assessment based on a degradation model
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Vol. 9 (4) , 636-650
- https://doi.org/10.1109/83.841940
Abstract
We model a degraded image as an original image that has been subject to linear frequency distortion and additive noise injection. Since the psychovisual effects of frequency distortion and noise injection are independent, we decouple these two sources of degradation and measure their effect on the human visual system. We develop a distortion measure (DM) of the effect of frequency distortion, and a noise quality measure (NQM) of the effect of additive noise. The NQM, which is based on Peli's (1990) contrast pyramid, takes into account the following: 1) variation in contrast sensitivity with distance, image dimensions, and spatial frequency; 2) variation in the local luminance mean; 3) contrast interaction between spatial frequencies; 4) contrast masking effects. For additive noise, we demonstrate that the nonlinear NQM is a better measure of visual quality than peak signal-to noise ratio (PSNR) and linear quality measures. We compute the DM in three steps. First, we find the frequency distortion in the degraded image. Second, we compute the deviation of this frequency distortion from an allpass response of unity gain (no distortion). Finally, we weight the deviation by a model of the frequency response of the human visual system and integrate over the visible frequencies. We demonstrate how to decouple distortion and additive noise degradation in a practical image restoration system.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortexPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Contrast in complex imagesJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1990
- Evaluation of subjective image quality with the square-root integral methodJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1990
- Independent processing of suprathreshold spatial gratings as a function of their separation in spatial frequencyJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1989
- A comparison of contrast detection and discriminationVision Research, 1986
- Spatial phase or luminance profile discrimination?Vision Research, 1984
- The Role of High Spatial Frequencies in Face PerceptionPerception, 1983
- Contrast-coding in amblyopia. I. Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopiaProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1983
- Grating contrast: Discrimination may be better than detectionVision Research, 1974
- The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of imagesIEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1974