Itemized Bill: Novel Method to Audit the Process of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
- 2 May 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 27 (6) , 666-670
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-6795-0
Abstract
One of the recurring obstacles to the successful completion of a medical audit cycle is the unavailability of accurate and complete information. This is particularly evident in the review of clinical processes, where the hand-written medical record is the source of information. We have attempted to bypass this information deficit by using information recorded primarily for financial transactions, using the itemized bill. The study was conducted in two parts. Initially information recorded as an itemized bill for the in-hospital process of laparoscopic cholecystectomies over a one-year period was analyzed. Areas for change in practice were identified, and recommendations were developed. These recommendations were presented to a multidisciplinary group consisting of consultants, residents, and nursing staff involved in caring for these patients. A clinical pathway was developed and implemented from these recommendations. One year after introduction, a review of the clinical pathway was undertaken using the same methodology. The in-hospital process consisted of 23 charge categories according to the itemized bill. Of these, 8 accounted for 95% of the total charge. The surgeon’s fee and the anesthesiologist’s fee accounted for 34% of the total; medical/surgical supplies, 20%; operating theater time, 17%; pharmacy, 7%; radiology, 5%; laboratory, 7%; and ward, 4%. Areas were identified in the latter 6 categories for change. Review of practice 1 year after implementation of the changes showed that a large number of recommendations were in place. We describe a new method for auditing the processes of medical care, using the itemized bill to adapt and use information primarily recorded for financial purposes.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why use clinical pathways rather than practice guidelines?The American Journal of Surgery, 1997
- A cost‐benefit evaluation of using propofol and alfentanil for a short gynecological procedureActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1996
- Role of intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Selective cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy versus Elective Open CholecystectomyJournal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, 1992
- The european experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomyPublished by Elsevier ,1991
- Meta-analysis of randomized, controlled clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1990
- Single dose cefotaxime plus metronidazole versus three dose cefuroxime plus metronidazole as prophylaxis against wound infection in colorectal surgery: multicentre prospective randomised study.BMJ, 1990
- Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: A Critique of Recent TrialsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1980
- SINGLE-DOSE PEROPERATIVE ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERYThe Lancet, 1976