Extended antipaternalism
Open Access
- 28 January 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 31 (2) , 97-100
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.005488
Abstract
Extended antipaternalism means the use of antipaternalist arguments to defend activities that harm (consenting) others. As an example, a smoker’s right to smoke is often invoked in defence of the activities of tobacco companies. It can, however, be shown that antipaternalism in the proper sense does not imply such extended antipaternalism. We may therefore approve of Mill’s antipaternalist principle (namely, that the only reason to interfere with someone’s behaviour is to protect others from harm) without accepting activities that harm (consenting) others. This has immediate consequences for the ethics of public health. An antipaternalist need not refrain from interfering with activities such as the marketing of tobacco or heroin, boxing promotion, driving with unbelted passengers, or buying sex from “voluntary” prostitutes.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Structure of Values and NormsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2001
- Sport medicine and the ethics of boxing.British Journal of Sports Medicine, 1999
- Childhood lead poisoning: the promise and abandonment of primary prevention.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- The invisibility of public health: population-level measures in a politics of market individualism.American Journal of Public Health, 1997
- A formal representation of declaration-related legal relationsLaw and Philosophy, 1990
- The tyranny of health promotion.1986
- Mill versus PaternalismEthics, 1980
- Upholding Legal RightsEthics, 1975