The joint evolution of defence and inducibility against natural enemies
- 7 December 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Theoretical Biology
- Vol. 231 (3) , 389-396
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.07.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Induced Defenses May Be Favored Over Constitutive Strategies in PlantsPublished by JSTOR ,2021
- Immunogenetic aspects of the cellular immune response of Drosophila against parasitoidsImmunogenetics, 2001
- Induced indirect defence in a lycaenid-ant association: the regulation of a resource in a mutualismProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2000
- Racing against host's immunity defenses: a likely strategy for passive evasion of encapsulation in Asobara tabida parasitoidsJournal of Insect Physiology, 2000
- Cross-Resistance Following Artificial Selection for Increased Defense against Parasitoids in Drosophila melanogasterEvolution, 1999
- Hemocyte load and immune resistance to Asobara tabida are correlated in species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroupJournal of Insect Physiology, 1998
- Trade–off associated with selection for increased ability to resist parasitoid attack in Drosophila melanogasterProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1998
- Variation in Drosophila concentration of haemocytes associated with different ability to encapsulate Asobara tabida larval parasitoidJournal of Insect Physiology, 1996
- Defended Fortresses or Moving Targets? Another Model of Inducible Defenses Inspired by Military MetaphorsThe American Naturalist, 1994
- Inducible Defenses and the Allocation of Resources: A Minimal ModelThe American Naturalist, 1992