Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation: A Pooled Analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group
Top Cited Papers
- 20 July 2008
- journal article
- thoracic oncology
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 26 (21) , 3552-3559
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.13.9030
Abstract
Purpose: Several recent trials have shown a significant overall survival (OS) benefit from postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation was to identify treatment options associated with a higher benefit or groups of patients who particularly benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Individual patient data were collected and pooled from the five largest trials (4,584 patients) of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in completely resected patients that were conducted after the 1995 NSCLC meta-analysis. The interactions between patient subgroups or treatment types and chemotherapy effect on OS were analyzed using hazard ratios (HRs) and log-rank tests stratified by trial. Results: With a median follow-up time of 5.2 years, the overall HR of death was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.96; P = .005), corresponding to a 5-year absolute benefit of 5.4% from chemotherapy. There was no heterogeneity of chemotherapy effect among trials. The benefit varied with stage (test for trend, P = .04; HR for stage IA = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.06; HR for stage IB = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.10; HR for stage II = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.95; and HR for stage III = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94). The effect of chemotherapy did not vary significantly (test for interaction, P = .11) with the associated drugs, including vinorelbine (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.91), etoposide or vinca alkaloid (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.07), or other (HR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.13). Chemotherapy effect was higher in patients with better performance status. There was no interaction between chemotherapy effect and sex, age, histology, type of surgery, planned radiotherapy, or planned total dose of cisplatin. Conclusion: Postoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improves survival in patients with NSCLC.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB–IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet Oncology, 2006
- Survival improvement in resectable non-small cell lung cancer with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy: Results of a meta-analysis of the literatureLung Cancer, 2005
- Vinorelbine plus Cisplatin vs. Observation in Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Reappraisal With a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Postoperative chemotherapy for non–small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysisThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2004
- Chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: the surgical setting of the Big Lung Trial1European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- Cisplatin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Completely Resected Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Randomized Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Completely Resected Stage I, II, or IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2003
- Postoperative radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from nine randomised controlled trialsThe Lancet, 1998
- Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trialsBMJ, 1995