Patrimonialism
- 1 July 1982
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 34 (4) , 548-559
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2010334
Abstract
During the last decade, the concept of patrimonialism has become firmly embedded in political science and the sociological literature, being used primarily to explain the operation of bureaucracies in the underdeveloped world. This research note examines some of the usages of the term and attempts to assess its explanatory value. It is suggested that, as employed in much recent literature, “patrimonialism” has not contributed a great deal to the understanding of underdeveloped polities. The author argues that this is primarily because the literature has generally ignored the broader structural factors of which the phenomenon of patrimonialism is a manifestation. Taking account of these structural factors and locating patrimonialism within the broader context of underdevelopment will better equip us to understand the character and operation of Third World bureaucracies.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patrimonialism and Military Rule in IndonesiaWorld Politics, 1979
- Authority and Power in Bureaucratic and Patrimonial Administration: A Revisionist Interpretation of Weber on BureaucracyWorld Politics, 1979
- A charisma too versatile?European Journal of Sociology, 1978
- Charismatic Leadership in Islam: The Mahdi of the SudanComparative Studies in Society and History, 1972
- Political Clientelism and Development: A Preliminary AnalysisComparative Politics, 1972
- Personal Rulership, Patrimonialism, and Empire-Building in the New StatesWorld Politics, 1968
- Tradition and Modernity ReconsideredComparative Studies in Society and History, 1967
- Tradition and Modernity: Misplaced Polarities in the Study of Social ChangeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1967
- Charismatic Legitimation and Political IntegrationComparative Studies in Society and History, 1966
- The Thai BureaucracyAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1960