Optimal Rates of Movement for Kinetic Perimetry
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
- Vol. 105 (1) , 73-75
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1987.01060010079035
Abstract
• Duration, reliability, and sensitivity of kinetic thresholds were evaluated for the 1/4e, 1/ 2e, and 1/1e Goldmann-equivalent targets as a function of stimulus velocity (1° to 8°/s) using the SQUID automated perimeter. For all targets, the average duration of kinetic meridional scans decreased significantly as stimulus velocity increased from 1° to 4°/s. Minimal reductions in kinetic scan times were present for stimulus velocities above 4°/ s. All targets appeared to have reductions in sensitivity at velocities above 4°/s (target detection occurring at more central visual field locations) that were presumably related to the observers' reaction times. There were no consistent differences in the variability of kinetic thresholds for different stimulus velocities. When all factors were considered, a stimulus velocity of 4°/s seemed to be optimal for kinetic scans of all targets in the central and peripheral visual field.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- New Test Procedures for the Squid Automated PerimeterDocumenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series, 1985
- Variability of Visual Field Measurements in Normal Subjects and Patients With Retinitis PigmentosaArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1984
- Preliminary Examination of the Squid Automated PerimeterDocumenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series, 1983
- Kinetische PerimetrieOphthalmologica, 1969
- Zur Standardisierung der PerimetrieOphthalmologica, 1950