POSTMATING-PREZYGOTIC ISOLATION IS NOT AN IMPORTANT SOURCE OF SELECTION FOR REINFORCEMENT WITHIN AND BETWEEN SPECIES IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA AND D. PERSIMILIS
Open Access
- 1 May 2005
- Vol. 59 (5) , 1039-1045
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01042.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exploring the consequences of postmating–prezygotic interactions between the sexesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2004
- The evolution of conspecific sperm precedence in DrosophilaMolecular Ecology, 2003
- Reinforcement: the road not takenTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2002
- Speciation by Natural and Sexual Selection: Models and ExperimentsThe American Naturalist, 2002
- CRYPTIC REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION IN THE DROSOPHILA SIMULANS SPECIES COMPLEXEvolution, 2001
- Absence of species discrimination inDrosophila pseudoobscuraandD. persimilismalesAnimal Behaviour, 1996
- Post-insemination signalling systems and reinforcementPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1993
- Is there Gene Exchange between Drosophila pseudoobsura and Drosophila persimilis in Their Natural Habitats?The American Naturalist, 1973
- Effectiveness of Intraspecific and Interspecific Matings in Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilisThe American Naturalist, 1947
- Speciation as a Stage in Evolutionary DivergenceThe American Naturalist, 1940