Call for Revolution: A New Approach to Describing Allograft Deterioration
Open Access
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Transplantation
- Vol. 2 (3) , 195-200
- https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20301.x
Abstract
I propose a set of definable entities in the renal transplant course, eliminating the need for the term ‘chronic rejection’. The status of a renal transplant can be defined by the presence and extent of rejection (T‐cell‐mediated or antibody‐mediated); allograft nephropathy (parenchymal atrophy, fibrosis, and fibrous intimal thickening in arteries); transplant glomerulopathy; specific diseases; and factors which could accelerate progression. The level of function and the slope of the loss of function should be separately determined. This approach can be applied both in research and in clinical practice, and can be adapted to other organ transplants.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delayed Graft Function: State of the Art, November 10–11, 2000. Summit Meeting, Scottsdale, Arizona, USAAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2001
- Acute rejection-associated tubular basement membrane defects and chronic allograft nephropathyKidney International, 2000
- Progression of renal damage in chronic rejectionKidney International, 2000
- Progression of renal damage in chronic rejectionKidney International, 2000
- ACUTE REJECTION REDUCES CREATININE CLEARANCE (Ccr) AT 6 MONTHS FOLLOWING RENAL TRANSPLANTATION BUT DOES NOT AFFECT SUBSEQUENT SLOPE OF Ccr.Transplantation, 1999
- The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathologyKidney International, 1999
- Mechanism of liver allograft rejection: The indirect recognition pathwayHuman Immunology, 1997
- EVIDENCE THAT THE VANISHING BILE DUCT SYNDROME IS VANISHINGTransplantation, 1990
- Long-term results, hemodynamics, and complications after combined heart and lung transplantation.Circulation, 1985
- CHRONIC SKIN HOMOGRAFT REJECTION IN THE SYRIAN HAMSTER *Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1960