Reproducibility of radial pulse wave analysis in healthy subjects
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal Of Hypertension
- Vol. 18 (8) , 1033-1040
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-200018080-00007
Abstract
To determine the reproducibility of parameters estimated by pulse wave analysis (PWA), mainly of central systolic blood pressure in the aorta (CSP), central systolic pressure–time index (CSPTI, area under the systolic part of the curve in the pressure–time graph per minute), and central augmentation index (CAI, pressure peak caused by wave reflection divided by pressure peak caused by ventricular ejection). In 88 healthy subjects, aged 19–53 years, radial pulse wave was registered by two investigators on separate visits in a random sequence, twice during each visit. Variability within and among subjects was significantly different for peripheral systolic pressure (PSP) and for all the above-mentioned parameters (P < 0.0001 by ANOVA for all). Variability within and between observers was tested by Bland–Altman plots; they did not show any trend for the variability to be dependent on the underlying mean value. PSP, CSP and CSPTI decreased significantly during one visit (by 4.6, 4.7 and 4.2%, respectively), PSP and CSP were higher at the first than at the second visit (by 2.2, 2.2%, respectively, and not significant for CSPTI), and there were also significant interobserver differences in all the three parameters as one observer measured higher values (by 2.4, 3.2 and 6.0%, respectively). CAI did not change within and between visits; the same applied to the difference between PSP and CSP since these pressures always changed in parallel. PWA gives estimates of several parameters characterizing the pressure load of central circulation and the wave reflection. The reproducibility of CSP and CSPTI is similar to that of PSP. CAI and the difference between PSP and CSP is not influenced by order of measurement, of visit or by investigator. Therefore, CAI is a more stable parameter than PSP measured by an oscillometric device. Since these parameters may contribute to a better assessment of cardiovascular risk, PWA might be used in prospective studies.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The reproducibility of central aortic blood pressure measurements in healthy subjects using applanation tonometry and sphygmocardiographyJournal of Human Hypertension, 1999
- Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysisJournal Of Hypertension, 1998
- Pulse PressureHypertension, 1997
- Systolic Blood Pressure RevisitedJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- Estimation of Central Aortic Pressure Waveform by Mathematical Transformation of Radial Tonometry PressureCirculation, 1997
- An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in manEuropean Heart Journal, 1993
- Arterial alterations with aging and high blood pressure. A noninvasive study of carotid and femoral arteries.Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology, 1993
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Systolic versus diastolic blood pressure and risk of coronary heart diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1971
- Hemodynamic Determinants of Oxygen Consumption of the Heart With Special Reference to the Tension-Time IndexAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1957