Minimally Invasive Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Technologies in Hypothesis-Testing Clinical Trials of Innovative Therapies
Open Access
- 3 May 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 98 (9) , 580-598
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj162
Abstract
Clinical trials of new cancer drugs should ideally include measurements of parameters such as molecular target expression, pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior, and pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints that can be linked to measures of clinical effect. Appropriate PK/PD biomarkers facilitate proof-of-concept demonstrations for target modulation; enhance the rational selection of an optimal drug dose and schedule; aid decision-making, such as whether to continue or close a drug development project; and may explain or predict clinical outcomes. In addition, measurement of PK/PD biomarkers can minimize uncertainty associated with predicting drug safety and efficacy, reduce the high levels of drug attrition during development, accelerate drug approval, and decrease the overall costs of drug development. However, there are many challenges in the development and implementation of biomarkers that probably explain their disappointingly low implementation in phase I trials. The Pharmacodynamic/Pharmacokinetic Technologies Advisory committee of Cancer Research UK has found that submissions for phase I trials of new cancer drugs in the United Kingdom often lack detailed information about PK and/or PD endpoints, which leads to suboptimal information being obtained in those trials or to delays in starting the trials while PK/PD methods are developed and validated. Minimally invasive PK/PD technologies have logistic and ethical advantages over more invasive technologies. Here we review these technologies, emphasizing magnetic resonance spectroscopy and positron emission tomography, which provide detailed functional and metabolic information. Assays that measure effects of drugs on important biologic pathways and processes are likely to be more cost-effective than those that measure specific molecular targets. Development, validation, and implementation of minimally invasive PK/PD methods are encouraged.Keywords
This publication has 149 references indexed in Scilit:
- Imaging apoptosis in vivo using 124I-annexin V and PETNuclear Medicine and Biology, 2005
- Functional comparison of annexin V analogues labeled indirectly and directly with iodine-124Nuclear Medicine and Biology, 2005
- Activating Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Underlying Responsiveness of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer to GefitinibNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Professor Tom Connors and the development of novel cancer therapies by the Phase I/II Clinical Trials Committee of Cancer Research UKBritish Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Functional ultrasound methods in oncological imagingEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2002
- A phase I clinical trial of an oral formulation of the histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA)European Journal Of Cancer, 2002
- Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual frameworkClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2001
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- The Hallmarks of CancerCell, 2000
- Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendationsEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1999