Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) model using a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research
- Vol. 14 (5-6) , 373-388
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10629360310001623962
Abstract
A large number of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals are capable of disrupting the endocrine systems of experimental animals, wildlife and humans. These so-called endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), some mimic the functions of the endogenous androgens, have become a concern to the public health. Androgens play an important role in many physiological processes, including the development and maintenance of male sexual characteristics. A common mechanism for androgen to produce both normal and adverse effects is binding to the androgen receptor (AR). In this study, we used Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA), a three-dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship (3D-QSAR) technique, to examine AR-ligand binding affinities. A CoMFA model with and was developed using a large training data set containing 146 structurally diverse natural, synthetic, and environmental chemicals with a 106-fold range of relative binding affinity (RBA). By comparing the binding characteristics derived from the CoMFA contour map with these observed in a human AR crystal structure, we found that the steric and electrostatic properties encoded in this training data set are necessary and sufficient to describe the RBA of AR ligands. Finally, the CoMFA model was challenged with an external test data set; the predicted results were close to the actual values with average difference of 0.637 logRBA. This study demonstrates the utility of this CoMFA model for real-world use in predicting the AR binding affinities of structurally diverse chemicals over a wide RBA range.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative structure-activity relationship methods: Perspectives on drug discovery and toxicologyEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2003
- Structure‐activity relationship approaches and applicationsEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2003
- QSAR models in receptor-mediated effects: the nuclear receptor superfamilyJournal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM, 2003
- Structure−Activity Relationships for a Large Diverse Set of Natural, Synthetic, and Environmental EstrogensChemical Research in Toxicology, 2001
- QSAR Models Using a Large Diverse Set of EstrogensJournal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 2000
- Discovery of Nonsteroidal AndrogensBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1998
- QSAR Models for Binding of Estrogenic Compounds to Estrogen Receptor and SubtypesEndocrinology, 1997
- Endocrine disruptors and reproductive development: a weight-of-evidence overviewJournal of Endocrinology, 1997
- Research Needs for the Risk Assessment of Health and Environmental Effects of Endocrine Disruptors: A Report of the U.S. EPA-Sponsored WorkshopEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 1996
- Environmental Hormone Disruptors: Evidence That Vinclozolin Developmental Toxicity Is Mediated by Antiandrogenic MetabolitesToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1994