Cost and cost‐effectiveness of standard methadone maintenance treatment compared to enriched 180‐day methadone detoxification
- 23 April 2004
- Vol. 99 (6) , 718-726
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00728.x
Abstract
Aims To compare the cost and cost‐effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment and 180‐day methadone detoxification enriched with psychosocial services.Design Randomized controlled study conducted from May 1995 to April 1999.Setting Research clinic in an established drug treatment program.Participants One hundred and seventy‐nine adults with diagnosed opioid dependence.Intervention Patients were randomized to methadone maintenance (n = 91), which required monthly 1 hour/week of psychosocial therapy during the first 6 months or 180‐day detoxification (n = 88), which required 3 hours/week of psychosocial therapy and 14 education sessions during the first 6 months.Measurements Total health‐care costs and self‐reported injection drug use. A two‐state Markov model was used to estimate quality‐adjusted years of survival.Findings Methadone maintenance produced significantly greater reductions in illicit opioid use than 180‐day detoxification during the last 6 months of treatment. Total health‐care costs were greater for maintenance than detoxification treatment ($7564 versus $6687;P < 0.001). Although study costs were significantly higher for methadone maintenance than detoxification patients ($4739 versus $2855,P < 0.001), detoxification patients incurred significantly higher costs for substance abuse and mental health care received outside the study. Methadone maintenance may provide a modest survival advantage compared with detoxification. The cost per life‐year gained is $16 967. Sensitivity analysis revealed a cost‐effectiveness ratio of less than $20 000 per quality‐adjusted life‐year over a wide range of modeling assumptions.Conclusions Compared with enriched detoxification services, methadone maintenance is more effective than enriched detoxification services with a cost‐effectiveness ratio within the range of many accepted medical interventions and may provide a survival advantage. Results provide additional support for the use of sustained methadone therapy as opposed to detoxification for treating opioid addiction.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effective Medical Treatment of Opiate AddictionJAMA, 1998
- Interpretation of cost-effectiveness analysesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1998
- Methadone Transition Treatment: A Treatment Model for 180-Day Methadone DetoxificationInternational Journal of the Addictions, 1995
- Costs, effects and C/E‐ratios alongside a clinical trialHealth Economics, 1994
- In Search of Power and Significance: Issues in the Design and Analysis of Stochastic Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Health CareMedical Care, 1994
- Markov Models in Medical Decision MakingMedical Decision Making, 1993
- Cost-effectiveness league tables: More harm than good?Social Science & Medicine, 1993
- The fifth edition of the addiction severity indexJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 1992
- Multiple imputation in health‐are databases: An overview and some applicationsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986