Monetary Populism in Nineteenth-Century America: An Open Economy Interpretation
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 57 (2) , 367-395
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700018489
Abstract
The battle over gold is typically explained as driven by proinflation debtors. However, going off gold would also have caused a depreciation, raising tradable prices relative to nontradables prices and helping producers of exportable primary products. An analysis of Congressional votes on monetary legislation indicates that higher constituency debt levels were not associated with opposition to gold, whereas mining and agricultural production were. This suggests that gold politics was at least as much about the impact of the exchange rate on relative prices as it was about inflation of the overall price level.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exchange rate politics: Contemporary lessons from American historyReview of International Political Economy, 1994
- Invested interests: the politics of national economic policies in a world of global financeInternational Organization, 1991
- The "Wizard of Oz" as a Monetary AllegoryJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- Mortgage Rates and American Capital Market Development in the Late Nineteenth CenturyThe Journal of Economic History, 1987
- Reconstruction of a bimetallic price levelExplorations in Economic History, 1985
- Repeal of Silver Monetization in the Late Nineteenth CenturyJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1978
- Currency Depreciation, Hoarding, and Relative PricesJournal of Political Economy, 1973
- The Background of Populism in KansasThe Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 1925
- The Economic Background of Frontier PopulismThe Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 1924
- The Political Career of Ignatius DonnellyThe Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 1921