Hearing Performance in Noise of Cochlear Implant Patients versus Severely-Profoundly Hearing-Impaired Patients with Hearing Aids:Rendimiento auditivo en ambiente ruidoso en pacientes con implante coclear versus hipoacúsicos profundos con auxiliar auditivo
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 40 (1) , 26-31
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00206090109073097
Abstract
It is possible for most post-lingually deaf patients to attain significant open speech recognition following cochlear implantation. In contrast, many severely-profoundly sensorineural hearing-impaired patients receive no benefit from their hearing aids, especially in situations with background noise. The aim of the study was to evaluate the speech recognition ability in quiet and in noise of post-lingually deaf adults implanted with Combi 40/40+ cochlear implants versus severely-profoundly sensorineural hearing-impaired patients fitted with hearing aids. For this purpose, we tested two groups of patients: one that had received cochlear implants (n=22) and a group of subjects with severe-profound sensorineural hearing impairment, fitted with hearing aids (n= 15). All of the patients were tested using the Hochmaier, Schultz, and Moser Discrimination Test in quiet and noise. The results of the study demonstrate that most of our cochlear implant patients received a substantial benefit from their implant, achieving scores of 70 to 100 per cent (mean, 90 per cent) for the numbers test and 10 to 72 per cent (mean, 43 per cent) for the monosyllable test 1 year after implantation. Even in situations with background noise, scores of 1 to 99 per cent (mean, 45.65 per cent) for a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of + 15 dB 1 year following the implantation improved to 7 to 95 per cent (mean, 50.7 per cent) at 2 years and 8 to 99 per cent (mean, 60 per cent) at 3 years after implantation. These results are significantly (p<0.04) superior to the hearing aid patients’ scores of 1 to 64.2 per cent (mean, 26.7 per cent) for a SNR of 15 dB. The results of the present study may have clinical implications in regard to selection of candidates for cochlear implantation.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998
- The Identification of Consonants and Vowels by Cochlear Implant Patients Using a 6-Channel Continuous Interleaved Sampling Processor and by Normal-Hearing Subjects Using Simulations of Processors with Two to Nine ChannelsEar & Hearing, 1998
- Cochlear-Implant-Versorgung bei nicht tauben Patienten?*Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie, 1998
- The recognition of vowels produced by men, women, boys, and girls by cochlear implant patients using a six-channel CIS processorThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998
- Central odontogenic fibroma and intracranial aneurysm associated with tuberous sclerosisAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology, 1998
- Speech Discrimination Scores of Postlingually Deaf Adults Implanted with the Combi 40 Cochlear ImplantActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1998
- Cochlear implantation: a review of the literature and the Nijmegen results.The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1997
- Some Considerations in Evaluating Spoken Word Recognition by Normal-Hearing, Noise-Masked Normal-Hearing, and Cochlear Implant Listeners. I: The Effects of Response FormatEar & Hearing, 1997
- Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1996
- Better speech recognition with cochlear implantsNature, 1991