E-cadherin and urokinase-type plasminogen activator tissue status in gastric carcinoma
Open Access
- 15 September 1995
- Vol. 76 (6) , 941-953
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950915)76:6<941::aid-cncr2820760606>3.0.co;2-i
Abstract
Background. E‐cadherin (ECD) is known to be an invasion suppressor gene, and urokinase‐type plasminogen activator (uPA) plays a central role in infiltration of solid cancers. Methods. To elucidate the relationship between expression of these factors and metastasis in patients with gastric cancer, the authors examined immunohistochemically a combination analysis of uPA and E‐cadherin expression in 98 primary tumors, and the results were correlated with several parameters related to metastasis. Results. Among 125 tumors, 42 (34%) were evaluated as having E‐cadherin expression (E‐cadherin‐positive), and the other 83 (66%) were defined as having reduced E‐cadherin expression (E‐cadherin‐negative). uPA immunoreactivity was observed in 82 tumors (66%). There were four subtypes of patterns of uPA and E‐cadherin expression: 22 uPA‐negative/E‐cadherin‐positive, 17 uPA‐negative/E‐cadherin‐negative, 21 uPA‐positive/E‐cadherin‐positive, and 65 uPA‐positive/E‐cadherin‐negative. uPA overexpression and reduced E‐cadherin expression were associated with lymph node metastasis, vessel invasion, serosal involvement, and poor prognosis. In addition, uPA‐positive/E‐cadherin‐negative tumors were associated significantly with large tumors, positive serosal invasion, lymph node involvement, and poor prognosis. Patients with uPA‐positive/E‐cadherin‐negative expression had the poorest prognoses, compared with the three other groups of patients. uPA‐positive/E‐cadherin‐negative tumors had a fourfold relative risk of death when compared with uPA‐negative/E‐cadherin‐positive tumors. A Cox proportional hazard model projected lymph node status as the strongest of the prognostic variables, followed by DNA ploidy patterns and uPA/E‐cadherin tissue status. Conclusions. These results indicate that immunohistochemical combination analysis of uPA and E‐cadherin expression may be a powerful aid in evaluating meta‐static potential or the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Cancer 1995;76:941–53.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Molecular aspects of tumor cell invasion and metastasisCancer, 1993
- Hyperthermo‐chemotherapy combined with cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal disseminationWorld Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Cadherin Cell Adhesion Receptors as a Morphogenetic RegulatorScience, 1991
- Novel function for beta 1 integrins in keratinocyte cell-cell interactions.The Journal of cell biology, 1990
- Transforming growth factor-β switches the pattern of integrins expressed in MG-63 human osteosarcoma cells and causes a selective loss of cell adhesion to lamininJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1989
- Correlation of DNA ploidy and clinical outcome in borrmann type 4 gastric carcinomaJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1989
- Unstable Expression of E‐Cadherin Adhesion Molecules in Metastatic Ovarian Tumor CellsJapanese Journal of Cancer Research, 1989
- Adhesion molecules during somitogenesis in the avian embryo.The Journal of cell biology, 1987
- Plasminogen activators, plasminogen activator inhibitors and procoagulant analyzed in twenty human tumor cell linesInternational Journal of Cancer, 1986
- Chapter 1: Interferons (IFNs)Published by Elsevier ,1986