DETERMINANTS OF THE RATINGS AND YIELDS ON CORPORATE BONDS: TESTS OF THE CONTINGENT CLAIMS MODEL
- 1 December 1987
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Financial Research
- Vol. 10 (4) , 329-340
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.1987.tb00506.x
Abstract
A contingent claims model for corporate bonds is tested on newly issued bonds of firms with very simple capital structures. Two default risk measures derived from the model — firm return standard deviation (σ) and leverage (D/V) — explain approximately 78 percent of the variation in the agency ratings on the bonds, based on a probit analysis. Model yield premiums explain almost 60 percent of the variation in market yield premiums. In both analyses, however, firm size is a significant additional variable, suggesting that the contingent claims model is not robust to changes in scale. The assumption of nonstochastic interest rates also appears to be an important misspecification. Institutional restrictions on investments in speculative grade bonds, however, do not affect market yield premiums on such bonds, and thus do not appear to represent a serious misspecification.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determinants of the Relative Interest Rate Sensitivities of Corporate BondsFinancial Management, 1987
- Corporate Bond Price Data Sources and Return/Risk MeasurementJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1986
- A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest RatesEconometrica, 1985
- The information in the term structureJournal of Financial Economics, 1984
- DISCUSSIONThe Journal of Finance, 1984
- Factors Affecting Seasoned Corporate Bond PricesJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1981
- Statistical Models of Bond Ratings: A Methodological InquiryThe Journal of Business, 1979
- The Pricing of Options and Corporate LiabilitiesJournal of Political Economy, 1973
- Bond Ratings, Bond Yields and Financial Regulation: Some FindingsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1973
- Determinants of Risk Premiums on Corporate BondsJournal of Political Economy, 1959