International Regimes: Problems of Concept Formation
- 1 April 1980
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 32 (3) , 331-356
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2010108
Abstract
Although we live in a world of international regimes, the scholarly literature on them remains rudimentary, especially in analytic terms. This essay examines the proposition that all international regimes are social institutions, even though there is great variation among them. Among other things, this suggests that regimes are dependent upon the maintenance of convergent expectations among actors; formalization is not a necessary condition for the effective operation of regimes; and regimes are always created rather than discovered. A conceptual framework and a research agenda for the comparative study of international regimes, as laid out in this essay, would guide studies of specific regimes and improve our ability to reach general conclusions about this fundamental, yet poorly understood, international phenomenon.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends versus Old TendenciesWorld Politics, 1979
- The implications of alternative solutions for regulating the exploitation of seabed mineralsInternational Organization, 1977
- On Systems and International RegimesWorld Politics, 1975
- Prolegomena to the choice of an international monetary systemInternational Organization, 1975
- Exploitation of Deep Ocean Minerals: Regulatory Mechanisms and United States PolicyThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1974
- Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the CathedralHarvard Law Review, 1972
- An Inquiry into the Workings of Arms Control AgreementsHarvard Law Review, 1972
- The Politics of Transnational Economic RelationsInternational Organization, 1971
- The New PropertyThe Yale Law Journal, 1964
- The Problem of Social CostThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1960