Ranking of histologic tissue responses in the biologic evaluation of dental materials
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Oral Sciences
- Vol. 96 (3) , 265-274
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1988.tb01554.x
Abstract
Implantation tests are frequently used to evaluate biological properties of dental materials. The tissue reactions have been rated as no, slight, moderate and severe responses, mainly based on a quantitative assessment of the cellular response. The distinction between categories is subject to discussion, and interexaminer calibration is necessary to obtain reproducible results. This paper presents a statistical method of evaluating tissue reaction by ranking photographic prints representing histologic sections. Polyethylene tubes, carrying the materials, were implanted subcutaneously in guinea pigs. The tissue reactions at the tube ends, where the material was exposed to the tissue, were evaluated. Photographs of 20 histologic sections were selected. Five investigators from a scientific staff and five from a group of assisting personnel with minimal instruction ranked the reactions on the prints in increasing order of severity. Assisting personnel received 1 h of instruction before the ranking. Generally, the rank ordering of the different examiners showed good agreement. Qualitative histopathologic examination of the sections indicated a marked variation in the cellular response, which limits the value of the quantitative assessment.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Enhanced tissue response to denture base polymers in formaldehyde-sensitized guinea pigsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1984
- Evaluation of the toxicity of denture base polymers after subcutaneous implantation in guinea pigsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1984
- Tissue response to allergenic leachables from dental materialsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1983
- Instrumentation for preparation and placement of subcutaneous implantsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1983
- Subcutaneous implantation for the biological evaluation of endodontic materialsJournal of Endodontics, 1981
- Methodological assessments of subcutaneous implantation techniquesJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1980
- American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association Document No. 41* for Recommended Standard Practices for Biological Evaluation of Dental MaterialsThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1979
- Subcutaneous implants for assessements of dental materials with emphasis on periodontal dressingsJournal of Periodontal Research, 1978
- Report of the Task Force on Biomaterials to the Cardiology Advisory Committee of the NHLBIArtificial Organs, 1978
- Three-year clinical comparison of three amalgam alloy types emphasizing an appraisal of the evaluation methods usedThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1976