Mining α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Features with Cross Species Sequence Alignments

Top Cited Papers
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Previously described algorithms for mining α-helix-forming molecular recognition elements (MoREs), described by Oldfield et al. (Oldfield, C. J., Cheng, Y., Cortese, M. S., Brown, C. J., Uversky, V. N., and Dunker, A. K. (2005) Comparing and combining predictors of mostly disordered proteins, Biochemistry44, 1989−2000), also known as molecular recognition features (MoRFs) (Mohan, A., Oldfield, C. J., Radivojac, P., Vacic, V., Cortese, M. S., Dunker, A. K., and Uversky, V. N. (2006) Analysis of Molecular Recognition Features (MoRFs), J. Mol. Biol. 362, 1043−1059), revealed that regions undergoing disorder-to-order transition are involved in many molecular recognition events and are crucial for protein−protein interactions. However, these algorithms were developed using a training data set of a limited size. Here we propose to improve the prediction algorithms by (1) including additional α-MoRF examples and their cross species homologues in the positive training set, (2) carefully extracting monomer structure chains from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) as the negative training set, (3) including attributes from recently developed disorder predictors, secondary structure predictions, and amino acid indices, and (4) constructing neural network based predictors and performing validation. Over 50 regions which undergo disorder-to-order transition that were identified in the PDB together with a set of corresponding cross species homologues of each structure-based example were included in a new positive training set. Over 1500 attributes, including disorder predictions, secondary structure predictions, and amino acid indices, were evaluated by the conditional probability method. The top attributes, including VSL2 and VL3 disorder predictions and several physicochemical propensities of amino acid residues, were used to develop the feed forward neural networks. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the resulting predictor, α-MoRF-PredII, were 0.87 ± 0.10, 0.87 ± 0.11, and 0.87 ± 0.08 over 10 cross validations, respectively. We present the results of these analyses and validation examples to discuss the potential improvement of the α-MoRF-PredII prediction accuracy.