Predicting charges for inpatient medical rehabilitation using severity, DRG, age, and function.
- 1 July 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 77 (7) , 826-829
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.77.7.826
Abstract
We examined the effectiveness of using diagnosis related groups (DRGs), Severity of Illness Index (SII), age and function at admission to predict inpatient charges for medical rehabilitation. Data from our sample of 199 indicate that DRGs alone explained approximately 12 per cent of the variation in charges for inpatient rehabilitation while SII explained 26 per cent of the variation. SII, DRG, and age together yielded the highest regression coefficient, accounting for nearly 39 per cent of the variation in total charges; SII and age accounted for 36 per cent of the variation. Within DRG categories, SII was the only important predictor of inpatient charges accounting for 23 per cent of the variation in charges among stroke patients (DRG 014) and 28 per cent of the variation in charges among hip fracture patients (DRG 210). Function at admission was not a useful predictor of inpatient rehabilitation charges within DRGs. These results suggest that SII and age may be useful in developing a DRG-based prospective payment system for inpatient medical rehabilitation.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Grading DRGsMedical Care, 1984
- Physical Disability and Public PolicyScientific American, 1983
- Measuring severity of illness to predict patient resource use within DRGs.1983
- Measuring Severity of Illness: Homogeneous Case Mix GroupsMedical Care, 1983
- Severity of illness: the DRGs' missing link?1982
- The failures of success.1977
- The Failures of SuccessThe Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 1977
- FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.1965
- Barthel IndexPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1965