Sunscreens – Which and What for?
- 19 October 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Skin Pharmacology and Physiology
- Vol. 18 (6) , 253-262
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000087606
Abstract
It is well established that sun exposure is the main cause for the development of skin cancer. Chronic continuous UV radiation is believed to induce malignant melanoma, whereas intermittent high-dose UV exposure contributes to the occurrence of actinic keratosis as precursor lesions of squamous cell carcinoma as well as basal cell carcinoma. Not only photocarcinogenesis but also the mechanisms of photoaging have recently become apparent. In this respect the use of sunscreens seemed to prove to be more and more important and popular within the last decades. However, there is still inconsistency about the usefulness of sunscreens. Several studies show that inadequate use and incomplete UV spectrum efficacy may compromise protection more than previously expected. The sunscreen market is crowded by numerous products. Inorganic sunscreens such as zinc oxide and titanium oxide have a wide spectral range of activity compared to most of the organic sunscreen products. It is not uncommon for organic sunscreens to cause photocontact allergy, but their cosmetic acceptability is still superior to the one given by inorganic sunscreens. Recently, modern galenic approaches such as micronization and encapsulation allow the development of high-quality inorganic sunscreens. The potential systemic toxicity of organic sunscreens has lately primarily been discussed controversially in public, and several studies show contradictory results. Although a matter of debate, at present the sun protection factor (SPF) is the most reliable information for the consumer as a measure of sunscreen filter efficacy. In this context additional tests have been introduced for the evaluation of not only the protective effect against erythema but also protection against UV-induced immunological and mutational effects. Recently, combinations of UV filters with agents active in DNA repair have been introduced in order to improve photoprotection. This article reviews the efficacy of sunscreens in the prevention of epithelial and nonepithelial skin cancer, the effect on immunosuppression and the value of the SPF as well as new developments on the sunscreen market.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sunscreen standards tested with differently filtered solar simulatorsPhotodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine, 2001
- Skin protection for photosensitized patientsLasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2001
- Sunscreen application technique in photosensitive patients: a quantitative assessment of the effect of educationPhotodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine, 2000
- Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Furocoumarin‐induced Epidermal Melanogenesis Does Not Protect Against Skin Photocarcinogenesis in Hairless MicePhotochemistry and Photobiology, 1998
- Sunscreens used at the beach do not protect against erythema: A new definition of SPF is proposedPhotodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine, 1997
- L-Ascorbic Acid Inhibits UVA-Induced Lipid Peroxidation and Secretion of IL-1α and IL-6 in Cultured Human Keratinocytes In VitroJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 1997
- Reduction of Solar Keratoses by Regular Sunscreen UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Dihydroxyacetone-containing sunless or self-tanning lotionsJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1992