Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
- 19 February 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 316 (8) , 450-455
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198702193160806
Abstract
A new type of research, termed meta-analysis, attempts to analyze and combine the results of previous reports. We found 86 meta-analyses of reports of randomized controlled trials in the English-language literature. We evaluated the quality of these meta-analyses, using a scoring method that considered 23 items in six major areas — study design, combinability, control of bias, statistical analysis, sensitivity analysis, and application of results. Only 24 meta-analyses (28 percent) addressed all six areas, 31 (36 percent) addressed five, 25 (29 percent) addressed four, 5 (6 percent) addressed three, and 1 (1 percent) addressed two. Of the 23 individual items, between 1 and 14 were addressed satisfactorily (mean ±SD, 7.7±2.7).Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perusing the literature: Comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials databaseControlled Clinical Trials, 1985
- Differential Effects of Exercise on Serum Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels Seen With Changes in Body WeightJAMA, 1985
- Findings for Public Health From Meta-AnalysesAnnual Review of Public Health, 1985
- Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trialsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1982
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- Combining results of independent studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of ResearchEducational Researcher, 1976
- Accumulating Evidence: Procedures for Resolving Contradictions among Different Research StudiesHarvard Educational Review, 1971
- THE POWERFUL PLACEBOJAMA, 1955
- The Combination of Estimates from Different ExperimentsPublished by JSTOR ,1954