Unfinished Business in Rape Law Reform
- 14 April 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Social Issues
- Vol. 48 (1) , 173-185
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01163.x
Abstract
Substantial and widespread changes in federal and state rape laws, designed to advance the concerns of feminists and law enforcement interests, have gone into effect over the past 15 years. Some researchers who have tried to assess the effects of these reforms believe the changes have thwarted feminist goals; others have found little impact on case processing or victims' experiences; still others have pronounced the reform efforts a success. There are many obstacles to measuring and achieving rape reform, the most notable being the need to eliminate juror misconceptions about rape and its victims. Contemporary research and law reform should focus on the trial process, especially on how rules of evidence and methods of constructing a rape case relate to social perceptions about gender, coercion, and sexuality.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rape Law Reform and Instrumental Change in Six Urban JurisdictionsLaw & Society Review, 1991
- Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988
- Juror common understanding and the admissibility of rape trauma syndrome evidence in court.Law and Human Behavior, 1988
- McCleskey v. Kemp: Race, Capital Punishment, and the Supreme CourtHarvard Law Review, 1988
- The Dimensions of Rape Reform LegislationLaw & Society Review, 1988
- The Rape Shield Paradox: Complainant Protection Amidst Oscillating Trends of State Judicial InterpretationThe Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1987
- Jurors' Responses to Victims' Behavior and Legal Issues in Sexual Assault TrialsSocial Problems, 1985
- Rape Reform and Criminal Justice ProcessingCrime & Delinquency, 1985
- Jurors' interpretations and jury decision making.Law and Human Behavior, 1985
- Man's Trial, Woman's Tribulation: Rape Cases in the CourtroomColumbia Law Review, 1977