Problems of relevance in the application of laboratory data to clinical situations'
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
- Vol. 30 (4) , 345-353
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00207148208407271
Abstract
Advantages and disadvantages of measuring [human] hypnotic susceptibility in clinical settings are presented. The argument for standardized methods of measurement in the interest of scientific advancement is balanced against clinical considerations and counterindications. The question of identity of hypnotic processes in the laboratory and in the clinical situation is addressed.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A tailored shss.c, permitting user modification for special purposesInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1979
- The stanford hypnotic arm levitation induction and test (shalit): A six-minute hypnotic induction and measurement scaleInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1979
- The use of hypnotizability scales in the clinic: A review after six yearsInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1979
- Scales Measuring Hypnotic Responsivity: A Clinical PerspectiveAmerican Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1978
- The Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for AdultsAmerican Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1978
- THE CONSTRUCT OF HYPNOSIS: IMPLICATIONS OF THE DEFINITION FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1977
- The Relationship between Hypnotizability and AlexithymiaPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 1977
- Specific vs Nonspecific Factors in Psychotherapy and the Problem of ControlArchives of General Psychiatry, 1970
- Three dimensions of hypnotic depthInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1962
- The nature of hypnosis: Artifact and essence.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959