Coming and Going: On the State Monopolization of the Legitimate “Means of Movement”
- 1 November 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Theory
- Vol. 16 (3) , 239-259
- https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00055
Abstract
Following the imagery of “expropriation” used by Marx to describe the process of capitalist development and by Weber to characterize states'monopolization of the legitimate use of violence, I argue that modern states have also “expropriated the legitimate means of movement” and monopolized the authority to determine who may circulate within and cross their borders. Against this background, we should reconsider the metaphor of “penetration” typically used to discuss the enhanced capacity of modern states relative to their predecessors, and instead think of states as “embracing” populations, identifying persons unambiguously in order to control their movements and to distinguish members from nonmembers. The vagabond is by definition a suspect. —Daniel Nordman (1987)This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Revolutions and freedom of movement: An analysis of passport controls in the French, Russian, and Chinese RevolutionsTheory and Society, 1997
- Nationalism ReframedPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- Fortcified Enclaves: The New Urban SegregationPublic Culture, 1996
- Refugees in Inter-War EuropePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1995
- Regulating the SocialPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1993
- Downcast EyesPublished by University of California Press ,1993
- The Sources of Social PowerPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- The New Institutionalism in Organizational AnalysisPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1991
- NAPOLEONIC CONSCRIPTION: STATE POWER AND CIVIL SOCIETYPast & Present, 1986
- The Formation of New States as a Refugee-Generating ProcessThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1983