Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond
- 17 August 2004
- journal article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 171 (4) , 349-350
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1040031
Abstract
Reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the only tangible evidence of their conduct. Yet historians may well view the first 50 years of reporting of RCTs with some surprise. They will encounter what might be described as a cognitive dissonance: a disconnection between the increasingKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2004
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD InitiativeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2001
- Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 2001
- Completeness of Safety Reporting in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2001
- Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for ReportingJAMA, 2000
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1996
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statementJAMA, 1996
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995