Effects of self‐monitoring and familiarity on deception detection1
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Quarterly
- Vol. 28 (3) , 3-10
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378009369370
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of familiarity and self‐monitoring on observer accuracy in deception detection. Observers varying in self‐reported self‐monitoring made judgments of truthfulness or lying after either exposure or no exposure to segments of a communicator's truthful behavior. Results indicated that observers familiar with a communicator's truthful behavior were significantly more accurate than those who were not; that accuracy increased significantly as self‐reported self‐monitoring increased; and that there was no significant interaction between self‐monitoring and familiarity.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Humans as Lie DetectorsJournal of Communication, 1980
- DETECTING DECEPTION: THE RELATIONSHIP OF AVAILABLE INFORMATION TO JUDGMENTAL ACCURACY IN INITIAL ENCOUNTERSHuman Communication Research, 1980
- THE TRUTH-DECEPTION ATTRIBUTION: EFFECTS OF FAMILIARITY ON THE ABILITY OF OBSERVERS TO DETECT DECEPTIONHuman Communication Research, 1980
- DETECTING DECEPTIVE COMMUNICATION FROM VERBAL, VISUAL, AND PARALINGUISTIC CUES1Human Communication Research, 1979
- Some effects of deception and level of self-monitoring on planning and reacting to a self-presentation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- TELLING IT LIKE IT ISN'T: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND RESEARCH ON DECEPTIVE COMMUNICATIONSHuman Communication Research, 1979
- Telling lies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Detecting deception from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception†Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 1969
- Effects of heightened motivation on the detection of deception.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1963