Prevalence, characteristics, and outcome of BK virus nephropathy in Japanese renal transplant patients: analysis in protocol and episode biopsies
- 2 December 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Transplantation
- Vol. 19 (1) , 97-101
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00305.x
Abstract
Abstract: Background: BK virus nephropathy (BKN) is recognized as a cause of graft loss in renal transplant patients. This may be related to the introduction of new and potent immunosuppressive regimens. In Japan, our experience regarding its prevalence, clinical significance, and outcome is still limited. In this study, our primary purpose is to outline the prevalence, outcome, and clinical characteristics of BKN as observed at Osaka University Hospital.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 112 biopsy specimens from 87 renal transplant patients. All transplantations were from living donors. Of the 112 biopsy specimens, 71 were from protocol biopsies and 41 were from episode biopsies. Calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroid were used in all patients (tacrolimus 32 and cyclosporin 55). In addition, azathioprine was used in 43 patients, mizoribine was used in 24 patients, and mycophenolate mofetil was used in 20 patients. BKN was diagnosed by light microscopic examination and a positive immunohistochemical staining of anti‐SV40 antibody in a biopsy specimen. In order to investigate the outcome and potential risk factors of patients with different histological staging, we divided the patients into groups A (mild histological change) and B (moderate or severe histological change).Results: Of the 87 patients, six were diagnosed with BKN. There were no significant differences between BKN patients and non‐BKN patients, except for the number of patients with graft loss (p < 0.001). Of the six BKN patients, three were in group A, and three were in group B. We recognized a significant difference between group A and group B in terms of anti‐rejection treatment including glucocorticoid, tacrolimus trough levels of over 8 ng/mL, episode of acute rejection within 1‐month post‐transplantation, and the time period between transplantation and BKN diagnosis.Conclusions: This is the first report of BKN in Japanese renal allograft recipients. In our hospital, the prevalence, risk factors, and outcome were similar to those previously for non‐Japanese recipients.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The high incidence of BK polyoma virus infection among renal transplant recipients in IndiaTransplantation, 2004
- Incidence of polyomavirus-nephropathy in renal allografts: influence of modern immunosuppressive drugsNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2003
- Prospective Study of Polyomavirus Type BK Replication and Nephropathy in Renal-Transplant RecipientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Clinical Course of Polyoma Virus Nephropathy in 67 Renal Transplant PatientsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2002
- Polyomavirus BK Nephropathy: A (Re‐)emerging Complication in Renal TransplantationAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2002
- Nephropathy Due to Polyomavirus Type BKNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Testing for Polyomavirus Type BK DNA in Plasma to Identify Renal-Allograft Recipients with Viral NephropathyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- BK-virus nephropathy in renal transplants—tubular necrosis, MHC-class II expression and rejection in a puzzling gameNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2000
- Polyomavirus Infection of Renal Allograft RecipientsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 1999
- POLYOMAVIRUS DISEASE UNDER NEW IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGSTransplantation, 1999