Comparison of Standardized and Nonstandardized Nuclear Grade of Renal Cell Carcinoma to Predict Outcome Among 2,042 Patients
Open Access
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 118 (6) , 877-886
- https://doi.org/10.1309/vlv6-brtr-hy5b-h485
Abstract
We compared the ability of original nuclear grades from surgical pathology reports and grades reviewed by a urologic pathologist to predict death dueKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic Impact of Histologic Subtyping of Adult Renal Epithelial NeoplasmsThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2002
- LACK OF ASSOCIATION OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA NUCLEAR GRADING WITH PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2001
- Prognostic Value of Renal Cell Carcinoma Nuclear Grading: Multivariate Analysis of 333 CasesUrologia Internationalis, 2001
- MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORSStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- Stage I Renal Cell CarcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1993
- Multivariate Evaluation of Prognostic Determinants for Renal Cell CarcinomaUrologia Internationalis, 1993
- Role of nuclear grading in stage I renal cell carcinomaUrology, 1989
- Renal cell carcinoma II. Histological indicators of prognosisPathology, 1987
- Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1982
- Prognostic criteria of renal cell carcinomaJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1974