Wound infection in undressed sutured wounds of the hand
- 1 July 1971
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 58 (7) , 543-545
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800580720
Abstract
A series of 265 sutured hand lacerations in an urban casualty department were grouped randomly into 3 groups: those receiving no dressing, an Elastoplast strip dressing, or a tubegauze dressing. Wounds showing microscopic or macroscopic pus at 10 days were deemed infected. Thirty-six per cent of wounds with no dressing became infected compared with 19 per cent and 16 per cent in the other two groups, this result being statistically significant (P<0.05). The doctor suturing the wound, the age of the patient, and the use of prophylactic Triplopen also appeared to have a statistically significant influence on infection.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- A study of completely undressed surgical woundsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1966
- Incidence and Source of Casualty Wound InfectionsInternational Journal Of Clinical Practice, 1965
- Bacterial flora of clean wounds and its relation to subsequent sepsisThe American Journal of Surgery, 1964
- POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION IN A CASUALTY DEPARTMENTThe Lancet, 1962
- Post-operative Infection in a Casualty DepartmentBMJ, 1961
- COMPARISON OF WOUND HEALING WITH AND WITHOUT DRESSINGSA.M.A. Archives of Surgery, 1952