Stories and numbers: Coexistence without compromise
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Advances in Nursing Science
- Vol. 18 (1) , 14-26
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199509000-00003
Abstract
Research methods are not paradigm specific but should be selected on the basis of whether they fit with the purposes of an investigation. In the postpositivist, interpretive, and critical paradigms, both qualitative and quantitative data or a combination of these may be used without violating paradigm assumptions. Attention to the four basic issues of quality of the data, investigator bias, quality of the research process, and usefulness of the finding is necessary to produce valid research. Although researchers in each paradigm deal with these differently, combining strategies across paradigms may enhance the scientific value of a study and result in new methodologies to address the health needs of all people.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability and Validity Issues in Phenomenological ResearchWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 1994
- Recommendations for state-wide evaluations: Lessons relearnedEvaluation and Program Planning, 1994
- Reconciling Paradigm Assumptions of Qualitative and Quantitative ResearchWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 1988
- Blending qualitative and quantitative approaches to instrument development and data collectionJournal of Professional Nursing, 1988
- Nursing Research and Social Control: Alternative Models of Science that Emphasize Understanding and EmancipationImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1985
- Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in ActionAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1979