Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 17 (9) , 767-773
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01780.x
Abstract
Human perception and memory are often explained as optimal statistical inferences that are informed by accurate prior probabilities. In contrast, cognitive judgments are usually viewed as following error-prone heuristics that are insensitive to priors. We examined the optimality of human cognition in a more realistic context than typical laboratory studies, asking people to make predictions about the duration or extent of everyday phenomena such as human life spans and the box-office take of movies. Our results suggest that everyday cognitive judgments follow the same optimal statistical principles as perception and memory, and reveal a close correspondence between people's implicit probabilistic models and the statistics of the world.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamicsNature, 2005
- Rational models as theories – not standards – of behaviorTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003
- Motion illusions as optimal perceptsNature Neuroscience, 2002
- A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memoryPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1997
- Star masses and bayesian probabilityNature, 1994
- Future prospects discussedNature, 1994
- Future prospects discussedNature, 1994
- Implications of the Copernican principle for our future prospectsNature, 1993
- Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological ScienceScience, 1987
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974