A preliminary pharmacokinetic study of 111In-labeled 260F9 anti-(breast cancer) antibody in patients
- 30 April 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
- Vol. 29 (1) , 43-50
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00199915
Abstract
Summary The pharmacokinetics of 111In-labeled 260F9, a murine monoclonal antibody directed against a breast-cancer-associated antigen, was determined in seven patients with advanced breast cancer. Six patients were administered 1 mg antibody containing 1 mCi 111In. The seventh patient was administered 20 mg unlabeled antibody followed by 1 mg 111In-labeled antibody all via a peripheral vein. Immunoprecipitation, HPLC and SDS-PAGE gels demonstrated the stability of radiolabel on the antibody. The serum clearance of the radiolabel closely fits (r 2>0.95) a two-compartment model for the first six patients. The apparent volume of distribution of the radiolabel approximated to the plasma volume (3 1) and its mean residence time was 23.7 h. The radiolabel had an average t 1/2β of 22.9±12.21 h at the 1-mg dose. At the 20-mg dose one-compartment elimination kinetics were observed with the radiolabel and antibody showing similar mean residence times (36–41 h) and a t 1/2β of 26–28 h. Whole-body imaging showed that the blood-pool:liver ratio of radioactivity increased fourfold (at 48 h postinfusion) at the higher dose and the percentage of the injected dose of radioactivity in the liver decreased from 25% to 8% (24 h postinfusion). In one patient 7–14 times more radioactivity was localized in a breast tumor than in fat (normal breast). Over the first 25 h an average (cumulative) 7.5% of the total dose was excreted in urine. A study of 260F9 in CDF-1 mice demonstrated that the radiolabel remained associated with the antibody in serum. The antibody, however, cleared 60-fold slower in mice than in patients and showed an increased mean residence time of 191 h. The disparity in the pharmacokinetics of the antibody seen in the mouse and in the clinic, points to the different behavior shown by murine monoclonal antibodies in humans. This points to the need for preliminary studies of antibodies in patients for preclinical evaluations of their effectiveness as drug-targeting agents.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Response of primary human mammary tumor cell cultures to a monoclonal antibody-recombinant ricin A chain immunotoxinCancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, 1988
- EFFECT OF ANTIBODY DOSE ON THE IMAGING AND BIODISTRIBUTION OF IN-111 9.2.27 ANTI-MELANOMA MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY1988
- PHARMACOKINETICS OF IN-111 LABELED OC-125 ANTIBODY IN CANCER-PATIENTS COMPARED WITH THE 19-9 ANTIBODY1987
- ENHANCEMENT OF THE SPECIFIC CYTOTOXICITY OF A BREAST CANCER-ASSOCIATED ANTIGEN IMMUNOTOXIN BY THE CARBOXYLIC IONOPHORE MONENSIN1987
- Pharmacokinetic analysis of biosynthetically radiolabeled mouse monoclonal antibodies in normal rhesus monkeysInternational Journal of Immunopharmacology, 1987
- Characterization of immunotoxins active against ovarian cancer cell lines.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1985
- EVALUATION OF MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BREAST-CANCER IMMUNOTOXINS1985
- The preparation of DTPA-coupled antibodies radiolabeled with metallic radionuclides: an improved methodJournal of Immunological Methods, 1983
- Use of Radiolabeled Antibodies to Carcinoembryonic Antigen for the Detection and Localization of Diverse Cancers by External PhotoscanningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- THE CATABOLISM OF HOMOLOGOUS AND HETEROLOGOUS 7S GAMMA GLOBULIN FRAGMENTSThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1965