Biological Adaptation: A Reply
- 1 December 1972
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 39 (4) , 529-532
- https://doi.org/10.1086/288478
Abstract
Michael Ruse [3] has criticized the distinction between biological function and evolutionary adaptation that I argued for in my article “Biological Adaptation” [2]. I shall show below that Ruse's criticisms are not, for the most part, well taken and that the distinction remains as I made it.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biological AdaptationPhilosophy of Science, 1972
- Biological AdaptationPhilosophy of Science, 1971
- ADAPTATION AND THE FORM-FUNCTION COMPLEXEvolution, 1965
- The Major Features of EvolutionPublished by Columbia University Press ,1953