Why Not Swing? Measuring Electoral Change
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- features
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in PS: Political Science and Politics
- Vol. 23 (02) , 178-184
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096500032753
Abstract
Over the last forty years the concept of swing has transformed the interpretation of elections, first in Britain and later in Australia, India and other countries. But Americans have been oddly reluctant to apply this most useful of simplifying formulas to election reporting or to the analysis of voting trends.Swing is a device for reducing to a single statistic all the complex movements in party support between one election and another. It offers a quick and easily comprehended indication of trends and of the extent to which voting behavior differs from one area to another.On election night in Britain, as soon as the broadcasters announce the first constituency counts, they also report the local swing, the net percentage movement between Conservative and Labour since the previous election, and on this basis they suggest what will be the final outcome ‘if the swing in the remaining seats resembles those already declared.’ Although this health warning is dutifully repeated, in fact the projection from the early results has always given a remarkably accurate pointer to the overall division of seats.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The British General Election of 1987Published by Springer Nature ,1988
- The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952-82American Journal of Political Science, 1987
- Assessing swings in multi-party systems: The Indian experienceElectoral Studies, 1984
- Swing Time: Assessing Causes for Shifts in Congressional ElectionsBritish Journal of Political Science, 1984
- Presidential Coattails in Historical PerspectiveAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1984
- Political Change in BritainPublished by Springer Nature ,1974
- THE DISUTILITY OF THE SWING CONCEPT IN BRITISH PSEPHOLOGYParliamentary Affairs, 1965