Comparison of Measures of Moral Judgment
- 1 August 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 43 (1) , 307-312
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1978.43.1.307
Abstract
Three measures of moral reasoning (Kohlberg's Moral Judgment Interview, Rest's Defining Issues Test, and Maitland and Goldman's Moral Judgment Scale) were administered to classes of college students to examine the relationship between the instruments as well as their internal consistency. The Kohlberg and Rest instruments showed the strongest relationship while the Maitland and Goldman measure correlated poorly with both. The Kohlberg measure produced the highest coefficient of internal consistency (which is perhaps to be expected given the nature of the scoring procedures), while the Maitland and Goldman measure produced the lowest coefficient of internal consistency.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Four Measures of Moral ReasoningJournal of Personality Assessment, 1977
- Irreversible, Stepwise Sequence in the Development of Moral Judgment: A Longitudinal Study of Males and FemalesChild Development, 1976
- Moral judgment as a function of peer group interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- Judging the important issues in moral dilemmas: An objective measure of development.Developmental Psychology, 1974
- Moral reasoning of young adults: Political-social behavior, family background, and personality correlates.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968