Themes, Thematic Progressions, and Some Implications for Understanding Discourse
- 1 July 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Written Communication
- Vol. 8 (3) , 311-347
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088391008003002
Abstract
This article explores some of the confusion and sources of that confusion in the research relating parts of clauses to the communicative roles that they play. It proposes that M.A.K. Halliday's system of analyzing a sentence into one or more of three possible kinds of themes and a rheme is a useful system in which the research relating parts of clauses to their communicative roles can be carried out. The article examines and briefly critiques Halliday's system of analysis and then goes on to compare some of Halliday's terms with those used in other systems. The article concludes by discussing some implications that this system might have for understanding aspects of discourse production, structure, or reception.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Philosophy of GrammarPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2013
- Text editingWORD, 1986
- The role of presupposed and focal information in integrating sentencesJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979
- Discourse functions of thematization and topicalizationJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1975
- What's new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehensionJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974
- PASSIVES AND TOPICALIZATIONBritish Journal of Psychology, 1973
- The psychological subject and predicateCognitive Psychology, 1972
- THE CHOICE OF THE PASSIVE VOICE IN A COMMUNICATIVE TASKBritish Journal of Psychology, 1968
- Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject or object focusJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968
- Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2Journal of Linguistics, 1967