Compensation, Incentives, and the Duality of Risk Aversion and Riskiness
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 59 (1) , 207-225
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00631.x
Abstract
The common folklore that giving options to agents will make them more willing to take risks is false. In fact, no incentive schedule will make all expected utility maximizers more or less risk averse. This paper finds simple, intuitive, necessary and sufficient conditions under which incentive schedules make agents more or less risk averse. The paper uses these to examine the incentive effects of some common structures such as puts and calls, and it briefly explores the duality between a fee schedule that makes an agent more or less risk averse, and gambles that increase or decrease risk.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Offsetting the Incentives: Risk Shifting and Benefits of Benchmarking in Money ManagementSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Does Option Compensation Increase Managerial Risk Appetite?The Journal of Finance, 2000
- Portfolio Considerations in Valuing Executive CompensationJournal of Accounting Research, 1991
- The Effect of Executive Stock Option Plans on Stockholders and BondholdersThe Journal of Finance, 1990
- The Determinants of Firms' Hedging PoliciesJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1985
- Incentive and Tax Effects of Executive Compensation PlansAustralian Journal of Management, 1982
- Resolving the Agency Problems of External Capital through OptionsThe Journal of Finance, 1981
- Moral Hazard and ObservabilityThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1979
- Risk Aversion in the Small and in the LargeEconometrica, 1964