Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of testing for angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype before starting ??-hydroxy-??-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor therapy in men
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pharmacogenetics
- Vol. 14 (1) , 53-60
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00008571-200401000-00006
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the potential cost-effectiveness of screening men for their angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-genotype before starting statin therapy. We used a combination of decision-analytic and Markov modelling techniques to evaluate the long-term incremental clinical and economic effects associated with genetic testing of men with hypercholesterolemia before starting treatment with statins. The study was performed from a health care payer perspective. We used data from the Rotterdam study, a prospective population-based cohort study in the Netherlands, which was started in 1990 and included 7983 subjects aged 55 years and older. Men treated with cholesterol-lowering drugs at baseline or with a baseline total cholesterol ≥ 6.5 mmol/l were included. The ratio of difference in lifelong costs between the screening strategy and the no screening strategy to difference in life expectancy between these strategies was calculated. We also performed a cost-utility analysis. The base case was a 55-year-old man with hypercholesterolemia who was initially untreated. Several univariate sensitivity analyses were performed. All costs were discounted with an annual rate of 5%. Screening men for their ACE-genotype was the dominant strategy for the base case analysis, because the screening strategy saved money (€851), but life expectancy was not changed. Screening was the dominant strategy for all age-groups in our cohort. Even in 80-year-old subjects, with the shortest life-expectancy, it was cheaper to screen than to give lifelong treatment to men with a DD genotype without success. Even if all DD subjects were treated with other (non-statin) cholesterol-lowering drugs, screening remained the cost-effective strategy. The results of the cost-utility analysis were similar. Discounting the effects with 5% per year also had no major impact on the conclusions. If other studies confirm that men with the DD genotype do not benefit from treatment with statins, screening for ACE genotype in men most likely will be a cost-effective strategy before initiating statin therapy.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic polymorphisms: importance for response to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitorsAtherosclerosis, 2002
- MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebocontrolled trialPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Systematic Review on the Risk and Benefit of Different Cholesterol-Lowering InterventionsArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 1999
- Prevention of Cardiovascular Events and Death with Pravastatin in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and a Broad Range of Initial Cholesterol LevelsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Primary Prevention of Acute Coronary Events With Lovastatin in Men and Women With Average Cholesterol LevelsJAMA, 1998
- The Effect of Pravastatin on Coronary Events after Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Average Cholesterol LevelsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Nontraditional Epidemiologic Approaches in the Analysis of Gene Environment Interaction: Case-Control Studies with No Controls!American Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease with Pravastatin in Men with HypercholesterolemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Markov Models in Medical Decision MakingMedical Decision Making, 1993
- Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: The Rotterdam elderly studyEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 1991