Incentives and opportunism: from the carrot to the stick
- 7 April 2010
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 277 (1693) , 2427-2433
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0065
Abstract
Cooperation in public good games is greatly promoted by positive and negative incentives. In this paper, we use evolutionary game dynamics to study the evolution of opportunism (the readiness to be swayed by incentives) and the evolution of trust (the propensity to cooperate in the absence of information on the co-players). If both positive and negative incentives are available, evolution leads to a population where defectors are punished and players cooperate, except when they can get away with defection. Rewarding behaviour does not become fixed, but can play an essential role in catalysing the emergence of cooperation, especially if the information level is low.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Positive Interactions Promote Public CooperationScience, 2009
- The Long-Run Benefits of PunishmentScience, 2008
- Winners don’t punishNature, 2008
- The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperationProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2008
- On the (in)effectiveness of rewards in sustaining cooperationExperimental Economics, 2007
- Reputational benefits for altruistic punishmentEvolution and Human Behavior, 2006
- Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world settingBiology Letters, 2006
- The coevolution of altruism and punishment: Role of the selfish punisherJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2006
- Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problemNature, 2004
- Trust, Reciprocity, and Social HistoryGames and Economic Behavior, 1995