A CONFLICT IN VASCULAR SURGERY
- 1 August 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 55 (4) , 373-376
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1985.tb00903.x
Abstract
It is believed that many surgeons, by adopting ''stripping'' as the routine surgical treatment of significant varicose veins may be sacrificing many major leg veins which could be potentially valuable arterial grafts. A protocol of surgery is suggested which replaces stripping by the stab-avulsion technique. Thus all varices are removed and distal incompetent perforators controlled. Freed from an inevitable ''high ligation'', it enables selective ligation at proximal valves, only when they are incompotent. It is suggested that this protocol treats varices effectively whilst preserving undamaged veins. The results presented show a 3 year recurrence rate of about 10%, but evidence is offered that better results will be obtained, now that Doppler equipment is readily available.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A CONFLICT IN VASCULAR SURGERYAnz Journal of Surgery, 1985
- THE USE OF DIRECTIONAL DOPPLER ULTRASOUND IN THE ASSESSMENT OF SAPHENOFEMORAL INCOMPETENCEAnz Journal of Surgery, 1983
- Sapheno-Femoral Valve Insufficiency in Varicose Veins of the Lower LimbAngiology, 1981
- To strip or not to strip the long saphenous vein? A varicose veins trialBritish Journal of Surgery, 1981
- The value of different forms of treatment for varicose veinsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1979
- The surgical cure of primary varicose veinsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975
- The results of simultaneous pressure recordings from the superficial and deep veins of the legIrish Journal of Medical Science, 1964
- VALVULAR DEFECT IN PRIMARY VARICOSE VEINS CAUSE OR EFFECT?The Lancet, 1963