Some comments on magnetotelluric response function estimation
- 10 October 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research
- Vol. 94 (B10) , 14215-14225
- https://doi.org/10.1029/jb094ib10p14215
Abstract
A new set of computational procedures are proposed for estimating the magnetotelluric response functions from time series of natural source electromagnetic field variations. These combine the remote reference method, which is effective at minimizing bias errors in the response, with robust processing, which is useful for removing contamination by outliers and other departures from Gauss‐Markov optimality on regression estimates. In addition, a nonparametric jackknife estimator for the confidence limits on the response functions is introduced. The jackknife offers many advantages over conventional approaches, including robustness to heterogeneity of residual variance, relative insensitivity to correlations induced by the spectral analysis of finite data sequences, and computational simplicity. These techniques are illustrated using long‐period magnetotelluric data from the EMSLAB Lincoln line. The paper concludes with a cautionary note about leverage effects by high power events in the dependent variables that are not necessarily removable by any robust method based on regression residuals.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Minimax Aspects of Bounded-Influence RegressionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983
- A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and Cross-ValidationThe American Statistician, 1983
- The Jackknife Estimate of VarianceThe Annals of Statistics, 1981
- Electromagnetic Response Functions from Interrupted and Noisy DataJournal of geomagnetism and geoelectricity, 1980
- Magnetotelluric data analysis: removal of biasGeophysics, 1978
- Jackknifing in Unbalanced SituationsTechnometrics, 1977
- Jackknife confidence limits using Student t approximationsBiometrika, 1977
- Robust Estimation of a Location ParameterThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1964
- A Test of Goodness of FitJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1954
- Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic ProcessesThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1952