Attitudes to and experiences of reporting poor care
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Clinical Governance: An International Journal
- Vol. 8 (4) , 331-336
- https://doi.org/10.1108/14777270310499423
Abstract
Surveys in the UK and USA show that error in health care is unacceptably high. It is also known, however, that considerable under‐reporting of error takes place and we need therefore to begin to understand why people fail to report so that we can introduce systems and develop cultures and systems which make this easier. Although this has been considered hypothetically, what happens in real situations and what the outcomes are for those individuals actually reporting has not been studied. This study is built on an earlier pilot of 228 doctors that considered the experiences and attitudes of a range of nurses and doctors to reporting their concerns. It includes those who went ahead and those who did not, as well as the attitudes of other staff with no experiences of wanting to report, and the types of event that were more likely to lead to reporting.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A system of medical error disclosureQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- Barriers to incident reporting in a healthcare systemQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record reviewBMJ, 2001
- Understanding Why Medication Administration Errors May Not Be ReportedAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 1999
- Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: an empirical studyJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1999
- Doctors' perceptions of the links between stress and lowered clinical careSocial Science & Medicine, 1997
- The Nature of Adverse Events in Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991