Can Multistage Production Explain the Home Bias in Trade?
- 1 March 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 100 (1) , 364-393
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.1.364
Abstract
A large empirical literature finds that there is too little international trade and too much intranational trade to be rationalized by observed international trade costs, such as tariffs and transport costs. This paper investigates whether a model in which the nature of production can change in response to trade costs—a framework with multistage production—can better explain the home bias in trade. The calibrated model can explain about two-fifths of the Canada border effect, about two-and-one-half times that of a model with one production stage. The model also explains a significant fraction of Canada-US “back-and-forth,” or vertical specialization, trade. (JEL F11, F13, F14)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International TradeAmerican Economic Review, 2008
- General equilibrium analysis of the Eaton–Kortum model of international tradeJournal of Monetary Economics, 2007
- Border effects and the availability of domestic products abroadCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 2006
- The trade-creating effects of business and social networks: evidence from FranceJournal of International Economics, 2005
- Trade CostsJournal of Economic Literature, 2004
- Intra-national versus international trade in the European Union: why do national borders matter?Journal of International Economics, 2004
- The Economic Significance of National Border EffectsAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border PuzzleAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- Technology, Geography, and TradeEconometrica, 2002
- Do National Borders Really Matter? Canada–US Regional Trade ReconsideredReview of International Economics, 1999