Variation in resource use within diagnosis-related groups: The severity issue
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- Vol. 1984, 71-78
Abstract
Several authors have suggested that diagnosis-related groups (DRG's) make inadequate allowance for the severity of illness. Before modifications of DRG's are developed, the sources of within-group variation must be precisely defined; not all variation is attributable to the severity of illness. The limitations of the Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set (UHDDS), of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification coding system and of the original rules of DRG construction must be evaluated and, if necessary, corrected before new approaches to groupings are considered. The most promising potential modifications of existing groups and weights are those that make use of the UHDDS, or of the UHDDS plus additional diagnoses and procedures. The addition of entirely new data elements to the discharge abstract and the pricing process should be considered only as a last resort.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnosis-Related Group Prospective PaymentEvaluation & the Health Professions, 1984
- Staging of Disease: A Case Mix MeasurementPublished by Springer Nature ,1984
- Statistical validation of a severity of illness measure.American Journal of Public Health, 1983
- Measuring severity of illness to predict patient resource use within DRGs.1983
- Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups.1980
- One strategy for controlling costs in university teaching hospitalsAcademic Medicine, 1978
- AUTOGRP: An Interactive Computer System for the Analysis of Health Care DataMedical Care, 1976
- Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unitThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1967
- Studies of Illness in the AgedJAMA, 1963