Risk factors leading to clinical failure in the treatment of intra-abdominal or skin/soft tissue infections
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 15 (12) , 913-921
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01690508
Abstract
A study of determinants of outcome in adult patients with intra-abdominal or skin/soft tissue infections treated with cefotetan, cefoxitin, or ampicillin/sulbactam monotherapy was undertaken. Patients were matched for principal infectious process, surgery performed for the management of the infection, year of hospital admission, age, and sex. The criteria for inclusion, exclusion, and matching of patients and assignment of clinical and microbiological outcome were based on the 1992 Infectious Diseases Society of America/Federal Drug Administration guidelines for the evaluation of anti-infective drug products. One hundred and thirty-seven cases of intra-abdominal or skin and soft tissue infections treated with cefotetan (n=47), cefoxitin (n=43), or ampicillin/sulbactam (n=47) monotherapy were selected without knowledge of outcome and analyzed using a single blinded analysis. The baseline characteristics did not differ between the treatment groups, nor did the rates of clinical or microbiological failure. A multivariate analysis showed that isolation of an organism resistant to the treatment regimen, includingPseudomonas spp., [odds ratio (OR)=14.9, p=0.001], being on antibiotic therapy at the time of admission (OR=4.5, p=0.007), and diagnosis of a complicated intraabdominal infection (OR=3.5, p=0.014) were independently associated with clinical failure. These data support the assertion that antibiotic resistant organisms in mixed anaerobic/aerobic infections are associated with clinical failure and suggest that the antibiotic regimen should be modified to includePseudomonas spp. in its spectrum when this organism is isolated from patients with such infections.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of a β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination for Serious Intra-abdominal InfectionsAnnals of Surgery, 1993
- Evaluation of New Anti-Infective Drugs for the Treatment of Intraabdominal InfectionsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Evaluation of New Anti-Infective Drugs for the Treatment of Selected Infections of the Skin and Skin StructureClinical Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Proposed definitions for diagnosis, severity scoring, stratification, and outcome for trials on intraabdominal infectionWorld Journal of Surgery, 1990
- A randomized clinical study of cefoperazone and sulbactam versus gentamicin and clindamycin in the treatment of infra-abdominal infectionsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1990
- Risk of Infection after Penetrating Abdominal TraumaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Antibiotic Trials in Intra-abdominal InfectionsAnnals of Surgery, 1984
- A Prospective Comparison of Two Regimens of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Abdominal TraumaPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1984
- Perforated and Gangrenous Appendicitis: An Analysis of Antibiotic FailuresThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1983
- A Randomized Clinical Trial of Moxalactam Alone versus Tobramycin plus Clindamycin in Abdominal SepsisAnnals of Surgery, 1983