Improving the quality of health care: Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care
Top Cited Papers
- 12 April 2003
- Vol. 326 (7393) , 816-819
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7393.816
Abstract
What are quality indicators? Indicators are explicitly defined and measurable items referring to the structures, processes, or outcomes of care.3 Indicators are operationalised by using review criteria and standards, but they are not the same thing; indicators are also different from guidelines (box 1). Care rarely meets absolute standards,5 and standards have to be set according to local context and patient circumstances. 6 7 Activity indicators measure how frequently an event happens, such as the rate of influenza immunisation. In contrast, quality indicators infer a judgment about the quality of care provided,6 and performance indicators8 are statistical devices for monitoring performance (such as use of resources) without any necessary inference about quality. Indicators do not provide definitive answers but indicate potential problems or good quality of care. Most indicators have been developed for use in hospitals but they are increasingly being developed for use in primary care.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetesQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- Performance indicators for primary care groups: an evidence based approachBMJ, 1998
- Preventing ischaemic heart disease in one general practice: from one patient, through clinical audit, needs assessment, and commissioning into quality improvement Commentary: Clinical and economic perspectives have to be integrated when selecting priorities for interventionBMJ, 1998
- Developing a Clinical Performance MeasureAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1998
- Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.Health Technology Assessment, 1998
- Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services researchBMJ, 1995
- Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicineThe Lancet, 1995
- Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluationsPublished by Elsevier ,1993
- A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical TechnologiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1986
- Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.American Journal of Public Health, 1984