ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION: CONTROVERSIES IN ELECTRONIC FETAL MONITORING Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring During labor: Information from Randomized Trials
- 1 June 1994
- Vol. 21 (2) , 101-104
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536x.1994.tb00242.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electronic Monitoring: Who Needs a Trojan Horse?Birth, 1994
- Randomised controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoringBMJ, 1994
- Plymouth randomized trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring in 2400 casesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993
- Cardiotocography during labour.BMJ, 1993
- Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda.BMJ, 1992
- CEREBRAL PALSY AMONG CHILDREN BORN DURING THE DUBLIN RANDOMISED TRIAL OF INTRAPARTUM MONITORINGThe Lancet, 1989
- Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring in a combined low- and high-risk population: a controlled clinical trialEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1986
- A Prospective Comparison of Selective and Universal Electronic Fetal Monitoring in 34,995 PregnanciesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Mothers' Views of Continuous Electronic Fetal Heart Monitoring and Intermittent Auscultation in a Randomized Controlled TrialBirth, 1985
- A controlled trial of fetal heart rate monitoring in a low-risk obstetric populationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981